|
![]() |
GDP can be measured in three ways, one of which is the sum of all income1. Using the income concept and comparing GDP2 to the number of payroll workers in the US3, we find that the average income per employee was $113,000 in 2010. This is an over-estimation of salary income since income can be earned from profits, rents, and other sources, however this gives us a ceiling to earnings per worker. Survey data show that full time US workers earned a median of $42,400 and average of $57, 4004 in 2009. Putting these figures together reveals that every two home sales generate one job.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential 1st quarter |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
North |
|||||
# Sold |
21 |
23 |
23 |
27 |
38 |
# Sold Chg |
-43.24% |
9.52% |
0.00% |
17.39% |
40.74% |
$ Sold |
$3,216,000 |
$5,686,987 |
$3,465,900 |
$5,628,850 |
$6,315,512 |
$ Sold Chg |
-61.64% |
76.83% |
-39.06% |
62.41% |
12.20% |
Central |
|||||
# Sold |
78 |
58 |
53 |
65 |
86 |
# Sold Chg |
-18.75% |
-25.64% |
-8.62% |
22.64% |
32.31% |
$ Sold |
$17,260,197 |
$9,136,250 |
$10,492,600 |
$14,335,027 |
$16,540,625 |
$ Sold Chg |
-22.42% |
-47.07% |
14.85% |
36.62% |
15.39% |
South |
|||||
# Sold |
53 |
33 |
60 |
66 |
58 |
# Sold Chg |
8.16% |
-37.74% |
81.82% |
10.00% |
-12.12% |
$ Sold |
$25,594,800 |
$9,819,400 |
$24,486,000 |
$26,921,850 |
$23,450,850 |
$ Sold Chg |
-9.65% |
-61.64% |
149.36% |
9.95% |
-12.89% |
Total # Sold |
152 |
114 |
136 |
158 |
182 |
Total # Sold Chg |
-16.48% |
-25.00% |
19.30% |
16.18% |
15.19% |
Total $ Sold |
$46,070,997 |
$24,642,637 |
$38,444,500 |
$46,885,727 |
$46,306,987 |
Total $ Sold Chg |
-21.86% |
-46.51% |
56.01% |
21.96% |
-1.23% |
Condo 1st Quarter |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
North |
|||||
# Sold |
3 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
|
# Sold Chg |
-50.00% |
-100.00% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
|
$ Sold |
$507,000 |
$392,000 |
$264,000 |
$538,500 |
|
$ Sold Chg |
-48.89% |
-100.00% |
-32.65% |
103.98% |
|
Central |
|||||
# Sold |
7 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
# Sold Chg |
-12.50% |
-57.14% |
100.00% |
-66.67% |
0.00% |
$ Sold |
$1,633,500 |
$542,000 |
$1,353,500 |
$450,000 |
$286,450 |
$ Sold Chg |
-0.27% |
-66.82% |
149.72% |
-66.75% |
-36.34% |
South |
|||||
# Sold |
6 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
8 |
# Sold Chg |
-14.29% |
-33.33% |
25.00% |
-40.00% |
166.67% |
$ Sold |
$2,372,500 |
$1,972,000 |
$1,515,000 |
$1,004,000 |
$1,955,125 |
$ Sold Chg |
18.77% |
-16.88% |
-23.17% |
-33.73% |
94.73% |
Total # Sold |
16 |
7 |
12 |
7 |
14 |
Total # Sold Chg |
-23.81% |
-56.25% |
71.43% |
-41.67% |
100.00% |
Total $ Sold |
$4,513,000 |
$2,514,000 |
$3,260,500 |
$1,718,000 |
$2,780,075 |
Total $ Sold Chg |
-2.47% |
-44.29% |
29.69% |
-47.31% |
61.82% |
Sales continue to rally in central Berkshire in the multifamily market, with a 27% increase over last year in sales volume and 50% increase in the number of units transacted, up to 15 multifamily units sold in the three months of the 1 st quarter.
North county also saw a significant increase over the 1 st quarter of 2011, but that should be tempered with the fact that 2011 reflected a drastic decrease in their multifamily sales market.
If looking solely at percentages, southern Berkshire saw a decrease in their multi-family market, but it should be understood that the typical 1 st quarter reports 1-3 sales in southern Berkshire to begin with.
Overall, our dollar volume transacted of multifamily units is up 11.7% and the number of units transacted is up 64%. This the third consecutive year that gains were reported in the first quarter of the year, and is much needed in a market that peaked in 2005 and saw significant decreases since 2010.
1 st Quarter |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
North |
|||||
# Sold |
8 |
13 |
9 |
1 |
7 |
# Sold Chg |
-42.86% |
62.50% |
-30.77% |
-88.89% |
600.00% |
$ Sold |
$912,500 |
$1,310,400 |
$726,600 |
$60,000 |
$522,500 |
$ Sold Chg |
-46.19% |
43.61% |
-44.55% |
-91.74% |
770.83% |
Central |
|||||
# Sold |
16 |
13 |
5 |
10 |
15 |
# Sold Chg |
-44.83% |
-18.75% |
-61.54% |
100.00% |
50.00% |
$ Sold |
$2,401,900 |
$1,437,100 |
$463,100 |
$997,030 |
$1,269,800 |
$ Sold Chg |
-45.78% |
-40.17% |
-67.78% |
115.29% |
27.36% |
South |
|||||
# Sold |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
# Sold Chg |
0.00% |
100.00% |
0.00% |
50.00% |
-66.67% |
$ Sold |
$100,000 |
$575,000 |
$335,000 |
$689,000 |
$157,500 |
$ Sold Chg |
-45.95% |
475.00% |
-41.74% |
105.67% |
-77.14% |
Total # Sold |
25 |
28 |
16 |
14 |
23 |
Total # Sold Chg |
-43.18% |
12.00% |
-42.86% |
-12.50% |
64.29% |
Total $ Sold |
$3,414,400 |
$3,322,500 |
$1,524,700 |
$1,746,030 |
$1,949,800 |
Total $ Sold Chg |
-45.89% |
-2.69% |
-54.11% |
14.52% |
11.67% |
Land 1st Quarter |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
North |
|||||
# Sold |
3 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
# Sold Chg |
50.00% |
-66.67% |
200.00% |
-33.33% |
50.00% |
$ Sold |
$335,000 |
$35,000 |
$170,400 |
$340,000 |
$128,500 |
$ Sold Chg |
280.68% |
-89.55% |
386.86% |
99.53% |
-62.21% |
Central |
|||||
# Sold |
1 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
7 |
# Sold Chg |
-83.33% |
200.00% |
66.67% |
-80.00% |
600.00% |
$ Sold |
$40,000 |
$425,000 |
$248,000 |
$60,000 |
$409,000 |
$ Sold Chg |
-86.71% |
962.50% |
-41.65% |
-75.81% |
581.67% |
South |
|||||
# Sold |
21 |
7 |
7 |
19 |
8 |
# Sold Chg |
40.00% |
-66.67% |
0.00% |
171.43% |
-57.89% |
$ Sold |
$7,563,590 |
$2,220,000 |
$1,744,300 |
$2,184,000 |
$1,391,500 |
$ Sold Chg |
337.94% |
-70.65% |
-21.43% |
25.21% |
-36.29% |
Total # Sold |
25 |
11 |
15 |
22 |
18 |
Total # Sold Chg |
8.70% |
-56.00% |
36.36% |
46.67% |
-18.18% |
Total $ Sold |
$7,938,590 |
$2,680,000 |
$2,162,700 |
$2,584,000 |
$1,929,000 |
Total $ Sold Chg |
275.15% |
-66.24% |
-19.30% |
19.48% |
-25.35% |
The far majority of Berkshire County residential sales are under $250K and we have decent inventory in that range. There is approximately 8.6 months of inventory, which is good. 7 months of inventory is considered a very balanced market.
The average price for the 976 active properties is $540,056.
• The highest price is $11,000,000.
• The median price is $325,000.
• The lowest price is $20,000.
• The average Market Time is 286 days.
The average price for the 107 pending properties is $236,566.
• The highest price is $2,950,000.
• The median price is $173,000.
• The lowest price is $40,900.
• The average Market Time is 152 days.
The average price for the 182 sold properties is $254,433.
• The highest price is $2,300,000.
• The median price is $165,000.
• The lowest price is $8,500.
• The average Market Time is 201 days.

|
2009 |
% chg |
2010 |
% chg |
2011 |
% chg |
Residential |
$204,102,253 |
-22% |
$242,268,780 |
19% |
$211,933,116 |
-13% |
|
821 |
-10% |
876 |
7% |
828 |
-5% |
$248,602 |
-13% |
$276,563 |
11% |
$255,958 |
-7% |
|
Residential Summary: We lost some momentum from gains in 2010, yet overall better than sales in 2009. Southern Berkshire market reflects a rising median sale price. The market retraction was fairly consistent throughout the county, but central county lost the most momentum after the 1st time homebuyer credit expiration. Our optimism is tempered with 2011 year-end figures that reflect an improving market from our low in 2009, but slightly off from the previous year. |
||||||
Condominium |
$16,870,179 |
-33% |
$16,380,586 |
-3% |
$20,552,400 |
25% |
55 |
-35% |
71 |
29% |
61 |
-14% |
|
$306,731 |
4% |
$230,712 |
-25% |
$336,925 |
46% |
|
Condo Summary: While the overall number of sales is down, the total dollars transacted in the condo market soared to over $20M sold, up a hefty 25% from sales in 2010. The median sale prices of condos also show a corresponding rise in all markets, with southern Berkshire sold volume making a huge leap from the previous year. |
||||||
Multi-Family |
$12,273,505 |
-21% |
$11,111,000 |
-9% |
$9,995,379 |
-10% |
98 |
-13% |
92 |
-6% |
88 |
-4% |
|
$125,240 |
-9% |
$120,772 |
-4% |
$113,584 |
-6% |
|
Multi-Family Summary: Sales are still falling in Northern and Southern Berkshire, but Central Berkshire reports a double digit increase. We had anticipated a rise in central multi housing stock by investors, hoping to jump in while markets are at an all-time low, and with the anticipated rental demand boost from General Dynamics relocations. Countywide, sale of multifamily units is still quite slow, and the number of units sold levels are that of 1996, and dollar volume at 1999 rates. |
||||||
Lots/Land |
$9,045,250 |
-54% |
$11,032,551 |
22% |
$8,603,650 |
-22% |
56 |
-36% |
87 |
55% |
73 |
-16% |
|
$161,522 |
-28% |
$126,811 |
-21% |
$117,858 |
-7% |
|
Land Summary: While sales fell yet again, there were some positive gains in southern Berkshire with an increase of 30% sold. While the movement is positive, sales are at 1998 levels and have a ways to go to improve. Overall, sales fell in 2011, but were still higher than the 2009 rates. Sales increased in 2010 by over 55%, and fell back 16% in 2011, still showing positive growth from the low point of the Berkshire land market. While we don’t expect to see land sales return to the heyday of 2003, our market is less than ½ of what it once was and has much room for improvement and steady gain. |
||||||
Commercial |
$6,529,900 |
-65% |
$4,647,501 |
-29% |
$10,682,500 |
130% |
|
17 |
-50% |
17 |
0% |
24 |
41% |
$384,112 |
-29% |
$273,382 |
-29% |
$445,104 |
63% |
|
Commercial Summary: While not all commercial sales are reported in our database, we were encouraged by a strong surge of Realtor assisted commercial transactions in 2011, over the previous 2 year period. Heavy gains in the number of units transacted and the total dollar volume are good signs on two levels – businesses are expanding and reinvesting, and the commercial market is meeting demands. |
||||||